|
|
Post by sparacus on Oct 10, 2012 14:38:41 GMT -5
You decide folks.
|
|
|
|
Post by richflair on Oct 10, 2012 15:20:33 GMT -5
What book did you read this week, Master?
|
|
|
|
Post by sparacus on Oct 10, 2012 15:21:38 GMT -5
What book did you read this week, Master? I have started the SHADA novel.  |
|
|
|
Post by youthofoz on Oct 10, 2012 17:10:52 GMT -5
Surely the best way to prove you're a Whovian is not to become mindlessly obsessed and remain open-minded and capable of enjoying OTHER things?
Hell, why does it need proving at all?
(And spara doesn't have the original novelization of Shada by Paul Scoones? HERESY!)
|
|
|
|
Post by lemonbloodycola on Oct 11, 2012 1:18:05 GMT -5
Have the ethos of the show tattooed on your soul.
|
|
|
|
Post by youthofoz on Oct 11, 2012 1:36:02 GMT -5
That's quite a good point, LBC. Everything in the options requires either being antisocial bordering on criminal activity or spending copious amounts of cash.
So, this tattoo - I suppose it has the Seal of Rassilon as part of the design?
|
|
|
|
Post by lemonbloodycola on Oct 11, 2012 3:14:34 GMT -5
to be fair the income one doesn't require having a lot of cash. Imagine if you were on the dole or in a low paying job and you had a spare tenner a week and you spent seven of it on Who related stuff.
You qualify.
|
|
|
|
Post by youthofoz on Oct 11, 2012 3:49:10 GMT -5
Well... I'm not on the dole, if that's what you mean. I was, following that nasty domestic incident back in Christmas 2010 when I lost seven pints of blood, but I am in paid employment. And (birthdays and Christmas aside), the only Who merchandise I've bought this year are the monthly DWMs.
I take your point that the ratio of income is not necessarily a fortune, and I trust you take my point that there is no need to "prove" Whovian status. After all, proof denies faith and without faith we are nothing...
|
|
